Spicks & Specks
Contact
incorporating 'A Thousand Miles of Moonlight'
directory to mongolian language related content

Suppositories

12 September 2012

The interface between Chinese and Japanese vocabulary is a zone of endless fascination. Today’s topic is suppositories, which I decided to cover after I recently discovered that I didn’t really know either the Chinese or Japanese words for this humble vector of medication.

Japanese: The most usual Japanese word for suppository is 座薬 zayaku. The meaning is ‘sitting medicine’ or ‘seat medicine’. The name is of Chinese origin. Japanese also has the term 座剤 zazai, with a similar meaning.

Chinese: The Chinese word for ‘suppository’ is less easy to determine. First, I tried Shogakukan’s Japanese-Chinese dictionary, 日中辞典 (Ch. rìzhōng cídiǎn, J. nitchū jiten). This gave 坐药 zuòyào (literally ‘sitting medicine’), which is obviously the origin of the Japanese term. The difference in character usage, vs , is systematic. Whereas modern Chinese differentiates between  zuò ‘to sit’ and  zuò ‘seat’, Japanese now generally uses  za for both.

However, since the Shogakukan dictionary is notorious for simply listing the identical term in Chinese rather than giving a true equivalent, I decided to cross-check with Google Translate. Sure enough, Google Translate gave a totally different term, 塞剂 sāijì (literally ‘blocking medicine’ or ‘plugging medicine’). Other sources also carry the related term 塞药 sāiyào.

While Google Translate is a great tool, not all of its translations are reliable. So checking with a further source was in order. Luckily I had The World Contemporary English-Chinese Core Words of Medicine (世界最新英汉医学精选词汇 shìjiè zuìxīn yīng-hàn yīxué jīngxuǎn cíhuì, published by 世界图书出版公司 shìjiè túshū chūbǎn shè) to hand, where I found yet another rendition: 栓剂 shuānjì (literally ‘plug medicine’). Which of these was to be believed? I will spare the reader a blow-by-blow account of my attempts to figure out the situation. To sum up, what I found was:

Others: Just for interest, according to online sources, the Korean name for a suppository is 좌약 jwayag (坐藥). Korean essentially uses the same term as Japanese, but follows the correct Chinese character usage when writing it in characters.

The Vietnamese name for a suppository is thuốc đạn (‘ball or cartridge or marble medicine’), although some sources indicate that this refers to tablets, not suppositories.

Mongolian takes a totally different tack, calling them эмчилгээний лаа emchilgeeni laa ‘therapeutic wax’. In fact, Mongolian has a range of closely related terms, all based on the term лаа laa ‘wax’:

  1. Эмчилгээний лаа emchilgeeni laa ‘therapeutic wax’.
  2. Эмчилгээний зориулалтын лаа emchilgeeni zoriulaltin laa ‘therapeutic purpose wax’.
  3. Үтрээний лаа ütreeni laa ‘vaginal wax’ – for vaginal suppositories.
  4. Цагаан махны лаа tsagaan makhni laa ‘white meat wax=rectal wax’ – for rectal suppositories.

The use of лаа laa ‘wax’ is quite probably under the influence of Russian свечи svyechi ‘wax’, which is used for suppositories in that language.

For the Mongolian of Inner Mongolia, on the other hand, the terminology is mostly a translation of Chinese:

  1. Шургуулах эм shurguulakh em ‘pushed in/inserted medicine’ (given as the equivalent of 栓剂 shuānjì).
  2. Чихэх эм chikhekh em ‘stuffed in medicine’ (given as the equivalent of 塞剂 sāijì).
  3. Лаа эм laa em ‘wax medicine’ (given as the equivalent of 坐药 zuòyào).

However, the fact that each Chinese term is translated differently suggests that the dictionary compilers could have made up the Mongolian terms on the fly.


leoboiko  said on 12 September 2012 (9:40 pm):

Shogukukan→Shogakukan, right?

I’m amused that the title of the dictionary itself shows that Shogakukan tendency, assuming that 日中辞典 can be rendered equally well as rìzhōng cídiǎn or nitchū jiten. Hard to think of this happening with the titles of other bilingual dictionaries (outside the Sinosphere I mean).

Bathrobe said on 13 September 2012 (8:29 am)

Oops! Thanks for pointing out the typo!

The romanisation is my own (rìzhōng cídiǎn), but the dictionary on its cover has RI-ZHONG CIDIAN (in capital letters) underneath 日中辞典. I probably would have added romanisations for both languages if the cover hadn’t given the Chinese pinyin.

If you check other Shogakukan dictionaries, you’ll find, for instance, that the Spanish-Japanese dictionary carries on its cover both 西和中辞典 and ‘Diccionario Español-Japonés’.


Sorry, I'm now using Disqus for comments. If you'd prefer not to use Disqus, please send me an email and I'll list your comments separately. Thanks!